|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 5-9
Use of anesthesia in pediatric dentistry: A cross-sectional survey
A Naurin Salma, Mahesh Ramakrishnan
Department of Pedodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Web Publication||7-Sep-2016|
A Naurin Salma
Department of Pedodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai - 600 077, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Aim: The aim of this study is to access the knowledge and use of dental anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of dental anesthesia among pediatric dentists. Materials and Methods: The survey was conducted among pediatric dentists who were practicing in Chennai, South India. A questionnaire was distributed which include questions relating to the use of local and topical anesthetics. Background: Anesthetic injection is the dental procedure that produces the greatest negative response in children. Pain and anxiety can reduce the efficacy of anesthesia in pediatric patients. This fear of anesthesia is often manifested as a behavior management problem, with a few pediatric patients lacking good coping skills and displaying hysterical behavior in anticipation of discomfort. Anxiety is the most disturbing experience for children, a response that sometimes can only be controlled with techniques beyond anesthesia. There are several factors that can predispose a patient to this overdose of anesthetic. The patient factors include age, weight, other medications, sex, presence of other systemic disorders, genetics, and mental attitude, and environment. There is a lack of studies accessing the usage and status of anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. Results: Eighty-eight percent used exact body weight to determine local anesthetic dosage. Only 11% of the respondents were using <10 s to inject a full cartridge. Topical anesthetics were used by most of the dentists. Most patients (98%) disliked the taste of topical anesthetics, and adverse drug reactions were rarely seen. Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that pediatric dentists are most commonly used local anesthetics as the preferred type and shorter needle for infiltrations and blocks. Most were taking anywhere from 31 to 60 s to inject a cartridge. Topical anesthetics were used by most and also the preferred one. However, their perception of the effectiveness of topical anesthetics varied. There also appears to be a need to develop newer and better mode of topical anesthetic delivery system in the pediatric dental population.
Keywords: Drug dosage, local anesthesia, topical anesthesia
|How to cite this article:|
Salma A N, Ramakrishnan M. Use of anesthesia in pediatric dentistry: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Pedod Rehabil 2016;1:5-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Salma A N, Ramakrishnan M. Use of anesthesia in pediatric dentistry: A cross-sectional survey. Int J Pedod Rehabil [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jun 26];1:5-9. Available from: http://www.ijpedor.org/text.asp?2016/1/1/5/189964
| Introduction|| |
The administration of local anesthesia, sedation, and general anesthesia is an integral part of dental practice. Local anesthesia is the temporary loss of sensation including pain in one part of the body produced by a topically applied or injected agent without depressing the level of consciousness. Local anesthetics act within the neural fibers to inhibit the ionic influx of sodium for neuron impulse. This helps to prevent transmission of pain sensation during procedures which can serve to build trust and foster the relationship of the patient and dentist, allay fear and anxiety, and promote a positive dental attitude.  Local anesthetics are frequently administered in dentistry and thus can be expected to be a major source of drug-related complications in the dental office. The most frequently observed complications (dizziness, tachycardia, agitation, nausea, and tremor) were transient in nature and did not require treatment.  Local anesthesia avoids some of the risks and unpleasantness associated with other forms of anesthesia, such as nausea and vomiting. The anesthetic action extends for longer than required and therefore provides pain relief for several hours after the operation. Local anesthesia is associated with reduced blood loss.  Topical anesthetics can be applied painlessly without needles and can reduce the need for physical and chemical restraints.  They also avoid the tissue distortion that occurs with infiltrated anesthetics.  Topical anesthetic agents are available in gel, liquid, ointment, patch, and aerosol forms.  Thus, the main purpose of this study is to evaluate the current status of dental anesthesia among dentists.
| Materials and Methods|| |
A survey was conducted among fifty pediatric dentists from South India. The survey included consists of a questionnaire including questions relating to the use of local and topical anesthetics utilized among pediatric patients, length of time used to inject a cartridge, factors deterring the dosage of anesthetics, form of systemic anesthetics used most commonly in children, length of the needle used often, effectiveness of topical anesthetics over local anesthetics, and what is his/her patients' most disliking factor about the topical anesthetic. Finally, the data were analyzed by calculating the percentage response for each question.
| Use of Anesthesia in Pediatric Dentistry: A Survey|| |
Name: Year of study
1. How often do you use anesthesia for treating pediatric patients?
a. Very often b. Often c. Rare
2. What is the common age group of pediatric patients requiring anesthesia?
3. Which do you use commonly?
Local or topical anesthetic
4. What form of systemic anesthetic do you use the most?
a. Nerve block b. Infiltration c. Gas
5. Do you use any topical anesthetic gel?
a. Always b. Sometimes c. Rarely d. Never
6. What is the most important factor that you consider commonly when you decide on dosage of local anesthesia that you will inject?
a. Exact age in years b. Exact body weight c. Others
7. What length of needle do you use most often?
a. Long b. Short c. Others
8. How much time do you take to inject a full cartridge?
a. <10 s b. 11-20 c. 31-60 s
9. Do you prefer topical anesthetics are effective than local anesthetics?
a. Very effective b. Effective c. Poor
10. What is the disliking factor about topical anesthetic?
a. Taste b. Color c. Small d. Consistency.
| Results|| |
All the questions in the questionnaire were answered by dental students. The data collected are represented as a bar graph.
Sixty percent of dental students use anesthesia often for treating pediatric patients while 30% use anesthesia very often and 10% use it rarely [Table 1].
|Table 1: The prevalence of usage of anesthesia for treating pediatric patients |
Click here to view
About 70% of dental students prefer local anesthesia whereas 30% prefer topical anesthesia [Table 2].
The response for the form of systemic anesthetic used is about 66% in case of infiltration and 36% in case of infiltration [Table 3].
The responses for the topical anesthetics are tabulated in [Table 4]. The respondents' responses to the question regarding the use of topical anesthetics, a majority of the respondents (86%) always used a topical anesthetic while 8% sometimes used a topical anesthetic. Only 4% reported that they rarely used topical anesthetic, with 2% reporting that they never used a topical anesthetic.
When questioned which criteria practitioners used to determine the local anesthetic dosage, almost half of the respondents (88%) reported using exact body weight when determining the dosage of local anesthetic for each pediatric patient while 8% used the patients' age and 4% used other methods such as number of teeth needing to be treated, length of treatment, and degree of carious involvement [Table 5].
|Table 5: The most important factor that you decide on dosage of the local anesthetic that you will inject |
Click here to view
Most of the respondents (88%) used a short needle, whereas 16% used a long needle for infiltration/nerve block [Table 6].
When questioned regarding the amount of time taken to inject a full cartridge of local anesthetic, 10% took < 10 s, 24% took 11-20 s, and 66% took 31-60 s [Table 7].
When asked about the effectiveness of topical anesthetics, 32% perceived them as effective, 36% as very effective, and 8% as poor [Table 8].
|Table 8: Do you prefer topical anesthetics are effective than local anesthetics |
Click here to view
When questioned concerning the different properties of topical anesthetic, most patients did not like the taste (98%) and consistency was not favored by 2%, with 6% reporting complaints by patients including burning, numbness of the entire mouth, and inability to swallow [Table 9].
| Discussion|| |
One of the most important and challenging aspects of child behavior management is the control of pain. Therefore, it is important that clinicians make every effort to minimize pain and discomfort during dental treatment. Because of the likelihood of the pediatric dental patient experiencing discomfort during restorative and surgical procedures, dentists turn to the use of local anesthetics and/or analgesics to control pain. The simplest and most effective method of reducing pain during dental procedures is via an injection of local anesthetic.  Unfortunately, the anticipation of receiving a "shot" tends to increase anxiety in the pediatric and adult patients.  Younger children do not have the ability to do this and thus may exhibit negative behavior before, during, and after the injection process. Local anesthesia can prevent discomfort associated with tooth preparation, pulp therapy, and extraction. There are very few contraindications for the use of local anesthesia in children during dental procedures. However, when administering a local anesthetic to a child, the clinician should be aware of the possibilities of anesthetic overdose, self-induced traumatic injuries related to prolonged duration of soft tissue anesthesia and technique variations related to the smaller skull and different anatomies in pediatric patients. 
The length of the needle should be long for all techniques requiring penetration of significant thickness of soft tissue.  Short needles may be used for injections that do not require the penetration of significant depths of soft tissue. 
As for the time taken to inject a full cartridge of anesthetic, a slow injection is important for two reasons: (1) For the safety of the patient and (2) to prevent the solution from tearing the soft tissue into which it is being injected. Rapid injection causes an immediate discomfort that lasts for a few seconds, followed by a prolonged soreness after the numbing effect of the local anesthetic has subsided.  It was recommended at least 60 s for a full 1.8 ml of cartridge as this rate of deposition will neither produce tissue damage either during or after anesthesia nor cause a serious reaction in an event of accidental intravascular injection. 
Topical anesthetics are effective to a depth of 2-3 mm and are effective in reducing the discomfort of the initial penetration of the needle into the mucosa.  Its disadvantages are the taste may be disagreeable to patient and the length of application time may increase apprehension of approaching procedure in the pediatric patient.
Most practitioners responded that the current topical anesthetics they were using in their offices were very effective (36%). The fact that 2% of them perceived topical anesthetics to be ineffective. Most practitioners responded that their patients disliked taste, consistency, and warm/burning sensation of the topical anesthetic.
| Conclusion|| |
The findings of this study demonstrate that pediatric dentists are most commonly using local anesthetic as the preferred type of using short needle for infiltrations and blocks. Most were taking anywhere from 31 to 60 s to inject a cartridge. Topical anesthetic was used by most and also the preferred one. However, their perception of the effectiveness of topical anesthetics varied. There also appears to be a need to develop newer and better mode of topical anesthetic delivery system in the pediatric dental population.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Malamed SF. Basic injection technique. In: Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 6 th
ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2013. p. 157-68.
Kravitz ND. The use of compound topical anesthetics: A review. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:1333-9.
Steward DJ. Manual of Pediatric Anesthesia. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1979. p. 5-13.
Hollander JE, Singer AJ. Laceration management. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:356-67.
Berde CB. Toxicity of local anesthetics in infants and children. J Pediatr 1993;122 (5 Pt 2):S14-20.
Rosivack RG, Koenigsberg SR, Maxwell KC. An analysis of the effectiveness of two topical anesthetics. Anesth Prog 1990;37:290-2.
Corssen G. Intravenous Anesthesia and Analgesia. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1988. p. 99-174.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry: Guidelines. Local anesthesia considerations during sedation. Pediatr Dent 1999;20:49.
Malamed SF. Pharmacology of vasoconstrictors. In: Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 6 th
ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2013. p. 25-38.
Hersh EV. Local anesthetics in dentistry: Clinical considerations, drug interactions, and novel formulations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1993;8:1020-30.
McDonald RE, Avery D, editors. Local anesthesia for the child and adolescent. In: Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 7 th
ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby Co.; 2000. p. 283-4.
McGrath PJ, McAlpine L. Psychologic perspectives on pediatric pain. J Pediatr 1993;122 (5 Pt 2):S2-8.
Malamed SF, editor. Drug overdose reactions. In: Medical Emergencies in the Dental Office. 4 th
ed. St. Louis: Mosby Co.; 1993. p. 230.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9]